Puckett & Faraj

The Law Firm of Puckett and Faraj, PC, has undertaken representation of Specialist Adam C. Winfield, U.S. Army, who has been charged with premeditated murder in connection with the death of an Afghan citizen in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan in May 2010.

Specialist Winfield’s parents are not speaking publicly about their son or the charge pending against him. The Firm is conducting its own investigation and is not immediately prepared to comment on the case. However we anticipate being prepared to comment as early as the first week in July.

We appreciate the media extending the courtesy of privacy to the Winfield family. The Firm partners Neal A. Puckett, Esq. and Eric S. Montalvo, Esq., will be representing Specialist Winfield in all future military justice proceedings. The Firm can be contacted via our website; Email info@puckettfaraj.com; and via phone 703-706-9566, 9AM to 5PM Eastern, Monday through Friday.

Major Hasan’s civilian defense attorney has indicated he may raise the insanity defense for the shootings of 13 military and civilian members of the Fort Hood community on 5 Nov 09. But he also indicates it is too early in the process to determine a defense strategy.

CID Investigation

The US Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) has not completed its investigation of the Hasan case. It may take several months to complete a thorough investigation. The current charges, levied days after the event, are not the final charges in the case. Since there were also dozens others wounded, charges of attempted murder are likely.

Preliminary Charge Sheet

While preliminary in nature, the substantial evidence pointing to Hasan as the shooter was justified as a basis for murder charges. CID recommended an initial charge sheet of 13 counts of murder. The commander reviewed the CID recommendations and with the Staff Judge Advocate’s (command legal advisor) advice, determined the specific UCMJ offenses to charge. The preliminary evidence also allowed the commander to determine the probability of flight risk and safety requirements for Fort Hood, to then order Major Hasan be placed in pre-trial confinement pending trial as well as further investigation of additional charges.

Defense Strategy Development

Major Hasan has been appointed military criminal defense attorneys along with the family’s retained civilian defense attorney. All attorneys expect additional charges based on a full and complete CID investigation. No criminal defense attorney develops a defense strategy until all the evidence is collected and reviewed. Additionally, Major Hasan cannot fully participate in his defense until he has recovered from his wounds.

Administrative Hearing

The recent hearing on 21 Nov, in his hospital room was an Initial Review Officer (magistrate) hearing to determine the legality of continued pre-trial confinement. Further, the prosecutors’ ability to provide answers to military defense attorneys depends on the progress of the CID investigation revealing additional evidence in the case. But one major advantage the defense attorneys in a military court-martial have is practically immediate access to all evidence in the case as soon as possible after it is reported to prosecutors. In federal and state courts sometimes information not intended for use at trial is withheld from defense attorneys.

The Hasan family has hired a civilian attorney to defend Major Hasan. The attorney spoke with the Major this week and has requested no law enforcement interviews with his client. The military justice system allows for a suspect to remain silent when Criminal Investigation Division (CID) requests an interview.

Statements to CID

When a suspect refuses to interview with military criminal investigative services, the military criminal defense attorney can focus on challenging the evidence rather than refuting statements made without an attorney present. While statements can either be coerced, partially factual, truthful or various perceptions of reality, finding the ground truth is the task of both the prosecution and the defense.

Statements Under Duress

Any statements made by a suspect must also be without coercion and voluntary. The state of the individual, under the influence of alcohol, drugs, medications or mental afflictions, can taint the statements and make them involuntary and inadmissible in a military court. Major Hasan, when charged, must be treated for his wounds and recover sufficiently to participate in his defense.

Speedy Trial

The 120-day clock for a speedy trial begins after a military member is served a charge sheet or placed in confinement. The speedy trial count down of 120-days can be delayed by either the prosecution or defense. Either the prosecution or defense presents a motion to a military judge who can deny, approve, or revise the request. The reasons for delay include but are not limited to, recovery from medical issues, mental health evaluations, and the interview of witnesses or collection of evidence.

Rights Under the UCMJ

Major Hasan’s lawyer must protect the rights of his client as provided by the 5th Amendment to the Constitution. When a military member hires a civilian attorney or is provided an appointed military defense counsel, he or she has the same protections under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, as anyone facing criminal prosecution in the U.S.

Three soldiers convicted of murder in late March 2007 execution-style of slayings of four bound and blindfolded Iraqi detainees. Two soldiers are serving life sentences and the third is serving 25 years. Their sentences were reduced to 40 and 20 years on appeal. The Iraqi’s had been taken into custody by the Soldiers in the Spring of 2007 after an exchange of gun fire with the Soldier’s unit.

MSgt Hatley Convicted

Master Sergeant John E. Hatley, the senior military member of the three, was acquitted of a fifth murder, but convicted of conspiracy to commit murder. A military member serving a life sentence resulting from a military court-martial is eligible for parole in 20 years. On August 14, 2009, His sentence was reduced from life to 40 years as a result of a clemency petition.

Clemency Petition Granted

A clemency petition is a request to the convening authority (usually the first general officer in the chain of command) to reduce the sentence from a court-martial. The military defense attorney provides a written request on behalf of the military member to justify why the convening authority ought to use his or her authority to reduce the sentence in the name of justice or fairness. A clemency petition outlines all the mitigating circumstances of the event leading to the conviction and the personal circumstance of the military member and his or her family.

Appeal Process and Presidential Pardons

Baring the convening authority’s change of the sentence, all military members cases that were convicted at courts-martial are automatically reviewed on appeal. Appeals review the military justice processes in accordance with the UCMJ and Manual for Courts-Martial to ensure a fair trial. In some cases, appeals can reverse some aspects of a court-martial requiring a military judge to review the case. After a military member has requested clemency and his or her case reviewed through the appeal process, the next step in gaining relief from the conviction is through a Presidential pardon.

Three soldiers convicted of murder in late March 2007 execution-style of slayings of four bound and blindfolded Iraqi detainees. Two soldiers are serving life sentences and the third is serving 25 years. Their sentences were reduced to 40 and 20 years on appeal. The Iraqi’s had been taken into custody by the Soldiers in the Spring of 2007 after an exchange of gun fire with the Soldier’s unit.

MSgt Hatley Convicted

Master Sergeant John E. Hatley, the senior military member of the three, was acquitted of a fifth murder, but convicted of conspiracy to commit murder. A military member serving a life sentence resulting from a military court-martial is eligible for parole in 20 years. On August 14, 2009, His sentence was reduced from life to 40 years as a result of a clemency petition.

Clemency Petition Granted

A clemency petition is a request to the convening authority (usually the first general officer in the chain of command) to reduce the sentence from a court-martial. The military defense attorney provides a written request on behalf of the military member to justify why the convening authority ought to use his or her authority to reduce the sentence in the name of justice or fairness. A clemency petition outlines all the mitigating circumstances of the event leading to the conviction and the personal circumstance of the military member and his or her family.

Appeal Process and Presidential Pardons

Baring the convening authority’s change of the sentence, all military members cases that were convicted at courts-martial are automatically reviewed on appeal. Appeals review the military justice processes in accordance with the UCMJ and Manual for Courts-Martial to ensure a fair trial. In some cases, appeals can reverse some aspects of a court-martial requiring a military judge to review the case. After a military member has requested clemency and his or her case reviewed through the appeal process, the next step in gaining relief from the conviction is through a Presidential pardon.